# IQ vs. Per Capita GDP by State (US)

I made you some more graphs.

I was originally going to use La Griffe du Lion’s Smart Fraction Theory to calculate this, but then I discovered that it doesn’t make any practical difference, so went with the simpler metric of IQ.

We have a correlation, but it’s not huge. There are a few states that seem like obvious outliers–the two states with the highest GDP per cap were Alaska (oil) and Delaware (tax haven of some sort.) Among under-performers, I speculate that Maine is being held back by geography (it’s really cold.) California has a low average IQ, but an abnormally wide IQ range, due to the presence of Stanford and Silicon Valley and the like, while West Virginia may have the opposite problem of an unusually narrow IQ range (it also has the problem of being in the mountains.) In these two cases, if I could actually calculate the smart fraction instead of using Griffe’s assumption of Gaussian distribution around the average, I’d probably get a more accurate result.

I decided to try running the regression again without the states with obvious external factors–California, Hawaii, Nevada, Alaska, West Virginia, Delaware, Maine, and Vermont–like tourism, climate, gambling, or oil. I did not eliminate outliers that did not have (potentially) clear reasons for their under- or over- performance (for example, I have no idea why Idaho should do worse than Wyoming. I also left in Louisiana, whose over-performance may be due to having a significant port and/or tourism.)

Potential conclusions:

1. Random chance matters. An oil boom in your area, nice beaches, or a long, harsh winter can push a state (or country) into wealth or poverty.
2. I suspect that redistribution strategies (ie, welfare) prevent states from dropping below a certain level, hence the near-flat line around \$32,000. (Outliers at Mississippi and W. Virginia.)
3. All else held equal, IQ matters.

Sources: Wikipedia, List of US States by GDP Per Capita; List of Average IQ by State (I found these same numbers elsewhere, so I suspect they’re reliable.)

## 7 thoughts on “IQ vs. Per Capita GDP by State (US)”

1. […] Source: Evolutionist X […]

Like

2. bob sykes says:

This is the kind of data analysis that used to drive me bat-shit crazy. Once one of my advisees came to me to complain that the statistics package (Excel) wasn’t working: every time he ran it he got a different line. I pointed out that none of the lines went through the centroid: the data matrix was a best ill-poised and might have had a zero determinant.

There is no, as in no, correlation. What you have is a mere random scatter-gram. The underlying problem is range restriction. Garrett Jones (“Hive Mind”) gets a correlation because his IQ range over nations is much larger, probably something like 70 to 115.

Liked by 1 person

• I started out just wanting to see if there was any correlation at all, and didn’t get much. Second attempt, as noted, tried to control for a few factors like mineral wealth, but obviously in a rough manner that may not be valid.

Like

3. […] IQ and GDP by state. […]

Like

4. […] compares average state IQ to per capita […]

Like

5. Michael Couck says:

Nice work. Indeed the correlation is obvious, not only for countries including the multiplier effect as described by Gerrett Jones, but also on an individual basis, higher iq higher income all other factors being equal of course. There are influences like corruption which reduces the velocity in the economy, but as a rule clever people earn more. Having said that, the millionair bracket is 110, which is the below average bloke at uni.

Like

• Thanks.
I’ve met a few people in life who are above average but not astonishingly bright, work hard, got a job in a well-paying profession, saved and invested well, got a decent inheritance from their parents, and ended up with a million. It takes some luck, but it’s doable.

Like