Elementary Communism

When I was a kid and one of my friends would ask for a bit of food–a spare french fry or nugget, say–I would always say “no” and then give them the food.

In retrospect, I was annoying.

My logic was that I would of course give my friend a french fry–I always gave my friends french fries if they wanted them–and thus the asking was superfluous. If anything, I thought we should pile all of the food up in the middle of the table and then everyone could just take what they wanted.

I don’t think I realized that some people have bigger appetites than others. Or germs.

A couple of years later I had a little job that mostly paid in candy. Since I don’t really eat candy, I became known in school as “the kid with the Skittles” because I tended to give it all away.

Around this time I began writing the first mini-essays (really only a few sentences long) that eventually morphed into this blog on the psychological/spiritual/anthropological meaning of food-sharing. (Food is necessary for life; to give it away to someone else signals that you care enough about their well-being to take a potential hit to your own survival chances, hence the significance of food sharing rituals among people.)

It’s not too surprising that by highschool I ascribed to some vague sort of communism.

Note: highschool me didn’t know anything about the history of actual communism. I just liked the idea of a political ideology based on sharing.

So I think I get where a lot of young “communists” are probably coming from. I loved my friends and enjoyed sharing with them so wouldn’t everyone be better off if everyone acted like friends and everyone shared?

There were two problems with my logic. The first, of course, is that not everyone is friends. The second is that in the real world, food costs money.

As a kid, food was, functionally, free: my parents paid for it. I got the exact same amount of french fries and pizza on my lunch tray as everyone else whether I was hungry or not, because our parents paid for it. In the real world, I don’t buy more french fries than I want to eat–I save that extra money for things I do want, like books.

So what happens if I want books and you want food? Or you want books and I want food? And you and I aren’t even friends? Or worse, when there isn’t enough food for both of us?

Sharing is great when everything is free and there’s plenty of it, or there’s a resource that you can only afford if you pitch in with several friends to purchase. (For example, everyone in the house shares the TV.) In other words, when you’re a kid.

But it scales up really badly.

The best laid schemes o’ mice an’ men
Gang aft a-gley.

Every single country that has ever tried communism ended up a disaster. Tens of millions starved to death in the USSR and China. Millions were murdered in Cambodia. North Korea is still an inescapable hellhole. Communism’s total death toll is estimated around 100 million people.

We didn’t exactly learn much about the USSR in highschool (or before.) It was one of the players in WWII, vaguely present in the few readings we had time for after the war, but certainly of much less prominence than things like the Vietnam War. It was only in college that I took actual courses that covered the PRC and USSR, (and then only because they were relevant to my career aspirations.) How much does the average person know about the history of other countries, especially outside of western Europe?

One of my kids accidentally did a report on North Korea (they were trying to do a report on South Korea, but accidentally clicked the wrong country.) The material they were given for the report covered North Korean mountains, rivers, cities, language, flag… And mentioned nothing about the country being just about one of the worst places on earth, where people are routinely starved and tortured to death.

Schools make sure to teach about the horrors of the Holocaust and slavery, but they don’t (as far as I know) teach about the horrors of communism.

So I think we could be in for a mess of trouble–because I understand just how appealing the political ideology of “sharing” sounds when you don’t know what it actually means.

8 thoughts on “Elementary Communism

  1. Yup. I am absolutely dumbfounded when I meet people openly saying they admire communism or marxism. Or defending Stalin, even. Or admitting that yeah, maybe Stalin was bad, but Lenin and the rest were quite OK!
    OTOH, even in Poland there are people who do not realize that some opposition activists were “disappearing” even after nominally free elections.

    Like

    • Stalin was “bad” because he “betrayed the revolution”, but that’s Trotskyist history. In fact, Stalin stopped the Revolution but did not reverse it, except to abolish free-love and restore marriage. Had he not secured absolute power, slammed on the brakes, and purged the Party, he would have been ousted by Trotsky, who would later be ousted by someone even *more* left-wing, and so on, eventually consuming most of the Soviet population in a Cambodian-style auto-genocide.

      https://blog.jim.com/culture/history-interpreted-as-left-singularities/

      By the time Stalin held real power, any other course of action would have led to an even worse outcome, for him and for the nation. It’s easier to stop an invading German army than a left singularity!

      Like

  2. Communism pretends to espouse the traditional morality of socially connected communities, but turns every part of it to support collectivized massess, where individuals are atomized and where the masses are led by a leader from high above in the mostly faceless hierarchy. People hope that they will get from communism what they would normally get from communities, but they never will. Communism is a inveigling trap, which uses social and moral needs of people to lure them to inhuman and anti-social societal and organizational arrangements.

    Like

  3. I believe a lot of intellectuals believe in Communism because they think they’re the ones that will run it. I think this because I’ve observed really smart people that believed in Communism. It’s the only way I can figure they see any value in it.

    Like

  4. Here’s my problem with what often comes to mind regarding communism: the form of societal structure forced/reinforced by a state. You, yourself, are an excellent communist so far as I can tell. In fact, based on just how charitable many people are, there are many communists. My ideal self would be communist. However, I would never, ever, ever, ever, ever want to live in a society where communism was mandated (or done for me). In fact, I don’t really believe that that is communism at all. That is theft. There is a very real difference between when I choose to give to a stranger, and when something is taken from me and given to a stranger. Communism (or charity, or love) is a natural reflection of the will of communist individuals. If it isn’t, then it is quite literally theft.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s